Agrarian Economy 2017 Т. 10 № 1-2:21-29
ON THE METHODOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN MODERN PHYSICAL ECONOMY
R. Nakonechny, cand. Sci.(Phil.),
А. Кopytko, cand. Sci.(Phil.),
Lviv National Agrarian University
https://doi.org/10.31734/agrarecon2017.01.021ANNOTATION
Physical economy at the turn of XX–XXI centuries, in terms of a globalized economy is progressively being adopted as an effective alternative to classical political economy and aims at revising the established (con-sumer) views on the relationship of man, society and nature in the course of business. This ideological system involves consideration of economic activities (individual and social) in a broader context, associated with knowledge of the principles of formation and functioning of the natural, social, informational, cultural and spiritual dimensions of human existence and society. It recognizes the effect of natural laws as primary when constructing models of management. In modern physical economy several methodological approaches are formed (above all - thermodynamic and infodynamic) for explanation and understanding of the relationship between men, society and nature, each of which has its strong and weak position, which should be known and considered when implementing in a social economic practice. The aim of this article is to analyze the determi-nant methodological aspects of research of infodynamic and thermodynamic models’ representatives of physi-cal economy, trying to justify their complementarity, not oppositeness or even incompatibility, as it is some-times suggested in modern science. The differences between the two models of physical economy are not as essential to sharply oppose them. After all, human labor, especially physical, can not be productive and energy efficient, without use of the information, intelligence and knowledge.
KEY WORDS
physical economy, natural laws, thermodynamic approach, infodynamic approach, information, economy, economy model, the noosphere, substance, intelligence, spirituality, morals, values.
FULL TEXT
LINK
1. Vernadskyy V. I. Autotrophy of mankind / V. I. Vernadsky // Selected scientific works acad. V. І. Vernadskyy : Т. 4. Geochemistry of living matter. Book. 1. – К. : NАS of Ukraine, 2012. – S. 115–129.
2. Vernadskyy V.I. Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon / V I. Vernadsky // Reflections of the naturalist: in 2 books. / USSR Academy of Sciences. In-t of history of natural science and technology; Composition: M.S. Bastrakov, V. S. Neapolitan, N. V. Filippova. - M.: Nauka, 1977. - Kn. 2. - 191 pp.
3. Vernadskyy V. I. Proceedings in the philosophy of natural science / V.I. Vernadsky. - M.: Nauka, 2000.- 504 p.
4. Gorlinsky V.V. The Philosophy of Safety and Sustainable Human Development: Valuable Measurement: Mo-nography / VV Gorlinsky. - K.: PARAPAN, 2011. - 378 p.
5. Hryniv L.S. Ecological Economics: monograph // L.S. Hryniv. - Lviv: "Magnolia 2006", 2010. –358 p.
6. Grinov L. S. Theoretical Measurement of Physical Economics: Models of Balanced Development in Households Systems / L.S. Grinov // Physical Economy in the Measurements of the State and Gift of Theory and Practice: Collective Monograph / ed. Yu. O. Lupenko, V. M. Zhuk, V. O. Shevchuk and O. V. Khodakivska. - K.: In-t agrar. Economics, 2013. - P. 93-153.
7. Hryniv L.S. Physical Economy: new model of sustainable development. Monograph // L.S. Hryniv. - Lviv: League Press, 2016. – 424 p.
8. Kanygin Yu.M. Physical economy as an alternative to political economy. Energy of progress / Yu.M. Kanygin. - K.: Arius, 2016. – 272 p.
9. Conceptual dimensions of environmental awareness: monograph / [M. Kiselev, V.L. Derkach, A.V. Tolstoukhov et al.]. Editor: M.M. Kiselev. - K.: PARAPAN, 2003. – 312 p.
10. Kostyrko I. Energy, labor and economic weight in the light of the theory of physical economy / I.Kostyrko // Agrarian economy. - 2009. - Vol.2. Number 3-4. - P. 94-97.
11. Materials of International seminar "Practical natural farming, product quality, performance, prospects". - Melitopol: Suite, 2013 – 329 p.
12. Panasiuk B.Y. Information system of the universe and man / B.Y. Panasiuk / Physical Economy: Research Methodology and Global Mission of Ukraine: Coll. The international material. Science. Conf., Apr 8-10. 2009, Kyiv. - K.: KNEU, 2009. – P. 286-299.
13. Podolynsky S.A. Labor rights and its relationship to energy distribution // Selected Works / [Ed., Preface and notes. Korniychuk L.Y.]; Kyiv, National Economic University / S.A.Podolynskyy. - K.: KNEU, 2000. – P. 203-283.
14. Rudenko M. Path to chaos // Energy progress. Gnosis and the present. Metaphysical Poem. Journalism. Poem / Mykola Rudenko. – Kyiv: Journalist of Ukraine, 2008. – P. 377-424.
15. Rudenko M.D. On the way to the World Monad // M.D. Rudenko. Energy progress. Gnosis and the present. Metaphysical Poem. Journalism. Poem / M.D. Rudenko. - K.: Journalist of Ukraine, 2008. – P. 493-498.
16. Shevchuk V.O. Modern knowledge of economy: problems of adequacy entry on the basis of physical economy / V.O. Shevchuk // Physical economy in measurements of management theory and practice: collective monograph / Ed. Y.O. Lupenko, V.M. Zhuk, V.O. Shevchuk and O.V. Khodakivska. - K.: NSC "Institute of Agricultural Economy", 2013 – P.154-170.
17. Shevchuk V.O. The vision of sustainable development issues from the standpoint of physical economy / V.O. Shevchuk // Physical economy in measurements of management theory and practice: collective monograph / Ed. Y.O. Lupenko, V.M. Zhuk, V.O. Shevchuk and O.V. Khodakivska. - K.: NSC "Institute of Agricultural Economy", 2013 – P.193-204.
18. Shevchuk V.O. Physical and economic thinking as an attribute of sustainability management / V.O.Shevchuk // Sustainability and security of agro sector of Ukraine in the conditions of globalization challenges: monograph / O.I. Pavlov, M.A. Hvesyk, V.V. Yurchyshyn; Ed. O.I. Pavlov. - Odessa: Astroprint, 2012. – P. 35-50.
19. Khodakivska O.V. The ecological paradigm - the basis of economic systems / O.V. Khodakivska // Physical dimensions of economy in theory and practice of management: collective monograph / ed. Y.P. Lupenko. - K.: NSC "Institute of Agricultural Economy", 2013 – P.226-229.