Agrarian Economy 2017 Т. 10 № 1-2:29-37
APPLICATION OF GENERAL SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN THE STUDY OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR OF AGRICULTURAL EN-TERPRISES
L. Petryshyn, candidate of economic sciences
Lviv National Agrarian University
https://doi.org/10.31734/agrarecon2017.01.029ANNOTATION
The article reveals the issue of application of general scientific methods in the process of studying of economic behavior of agricultural enterprises. The author points specific character of the methods application, depend-ing on types of approaches to scientific researches. The work stresses necessity to use dialectic and materialis-tic approach to study of economic behavior of agricultural enterprises. It is proposed to develop logic and working plans of a research as a main element of its general concept. A researcher should also keep to such principles of researching as the Occam’s razor principle, combination of intuition and logics, principles of accuracy and clarity. Among the general scientific methods of researches, in the process of studying of economic behavior of agri-cultural enterprises one should apply such methods as analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, model-ing, idealization, comparison, analogy method, ascent from a concrete to an abstract one. Method of analysis and synthesis is used for division of statistical total of agricultural enterprises into separate typical groups to define peculiarities of economic relations inside the groups as well as general tendencies and regularities, particular for economic behavior of all enterprises. Method of induction and deduction is used for generalization of theoretical approaches of domestic and for-eign scientists to the essence of economic behavior of agricultural enterprises. Analogy method helps to trans-fer knowledge about separate enterprises onto their total. The article also gives certain examples of applica-tion of other general scientific methods of research
KEY WORDS
economic behavior, agricultural enterprise, method, research, analysis and synthesis
FULL TEXT
LINK
1. Vereshchahin A.A. Economic behavior of business entities under conditions of oligo-political market structure: synopsis of a thesis for the scientific degree of Candidate of Econom-ics. – Yaroslavl, 2010.
2. Voinarenko M.P. Factor of economic behavior in enterprises activity /M.P. Voinaren-ko // Messenger of Khmelnytskyi National University. – 2011. - № 6. – V. 1. – P. 61-65.
3. Voitko V.V. Management of organizations’ behavior (on the example of industrial en-terprises): synopsis of a thesis for the scientific degree of Candidate of Economics: specialty 08.06.01. – Kharkiv: 2004.
4. Horniak O.V. Institutional theory of a firm / O.V. Horniak // Market economy: modern theory and practice of management. Ed. 9. – Zhytomyr, 2005. – P. 105-115.
5. Hracheva T.A. Behavior of an economic subject under conditions of market institutions establishment: synopsis of a thesis for the scientific degree of Candidate of Economics. – M., 2005.
6. DemydenkoS.L. Peculiaritiesofstrategicanalysisofanenterpriseenvironment /S.L. De-mydenko // Efficienteconomy. – 2015. - №9.// [Electronic resource] – Access mode:http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4290.
7. KaplenkoH.V. Formationof economic behavior of enterprises: synopsis of a thesis for the scientific degree of Candidate of Economics: 08.06.01 / H.V. Kaplenko; NAS of Ukraine. Institute of Regional Researches. – L., 2005.
8. Karachyna N.P.Economic behavior of machine-building enterprises: synopsis of a the-sis for the scientific degree of Doctor of Economics: specialty 08.00.04. – Lviv: 2012.
9. Kostyrko I. Indicators to measure transaction expenses / I. Kostyrko, S. Tymofiiiv // Agrarian Economics. – 2015. – V. 8, № 1-2. – P. 65-70.
10. Kudinova A.V. Entrepreneurship behavior: essence and determinants of its evolution / A.V. Kudinova // Actual problems of economy. – 2004. - № 4. – P. 104 – 111.
11. Raiter N. Assessment of competitive environment of agricultural enterprises as an in-strument of efficient strategic management / N. Raiter // Agrarian Economics. – 2016. – v.9. - № 1-2. – P. 75-82. https://doi.org/10.31734/agrarecon2016.01.075