Agrarian Economy 2021 Т. 14 № 1-2:75-81

Organization of production at organic farming enterprises

Sharyi H., Doctor of Economics, associate professor
Nesterenko S., Candidate of Engineering Sciences, associate professor
Shchepak V., Candidate of Engineering Sciences, associate professor
National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic»

https://doi.org/10.31734/agrarecon2021.01-02.075

ANNOTATION

The characteristic features of the environment of activities of agricultural enterprises of organic agriculture are studied in the work. In Ukraine, agricultural enterprises that have introduced organic farming operate in difficult conditions, as there are no governmental mechanisms to regulate organic farming and land relations to restore natural fertility and improve the land. Owners of land plots (shares) with the restored natural fertility of lands break contractual relations with organic enterprises causing decrease of the area of sanitized lands. To determine features of the enterprise management system, the authors identified the main aspects of its formation. The work highlights the components of the environment of agricultural enterprises of organic production and its main features. The components of the enterprises’ operation are the external and internal environment. The main factors of the external environment include state regulation of land relations, lease relations, rent relations, business environment for the formation of prices for agricultural products. The results of the study of the internal environment show that its characteristics are production, organic farming technology, animal husbandry, finance and management. The selected factors interact, each component having features that must be taken into account in the formation of the management system, must be adapted to business conditions and take into account changes in the business environment. The authors have developed a structural and logical model of formation of the management system at the agricultural enterprise of organic farming, which provides for the analysis and evaluation of the characteristics of environmental factors.

KEY WORDS

organic farming, agroecology, monopoly ecological rent, management of organic farming

FULL TEXT

LINK

  1. Antonets, S. S., Antonets, A. S. and Pysarenko, V. M., 2010. Organic agriculture: from the experience of PE «Agroecology» Shyshaky district of Poltava region. Poltava: RVV PSAA.
  2. Harvat, O. A., 2010. The influence of the external economic environment on the economic stability of the enterprise. Bulletin of Khmelnytskyi National University, 2 (148), p. 168–171.
  3. Hubenko, V. I., 2011. Marketing management of agricultural enterprises and production efficiency. Bulletin of Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, 113, p. 3–7.
  4. On Basic Principles and Requirements for Organic Production, Circulation and Labeling of Organic Products: Law of Ukraine of July 3, 2019 № 2496-VIII [online]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2496 -19 # Text [Accessed 14 April 2021].
  5. Sharyi, H. I. and Nesterenko, S. V., 2020. Institutional mechanisms of land development management. Economics and region, 4 (79), с. 6–14. https://doi.org/10.26906/EiR.2020.4(79).2157
  6. Sharyi, H. I., 2014. On the conditions and prospects of development of the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Land Management Bulletin, 6, p. 10–14.
  7. Shubravska, O. V., Moldavan, L. V. and Paskhaver, B. Y., 2017. Resource opportunities for development of the agricultural sector of the economy of Ukraine. Kyiv.
  8. Shykula, M. K. and Demydenko, O. V., 2004. Influence of the minimum cultivation on chernozem fertility. Bulletin of Agrarian Science, 8, p. 18–23.
  9. Taranenko, O. O., 2010. The influence of the external economic environment on the economic stability of the enterprise. Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University, 2 (148), p. 118–121.
  10. Fedorchenko, A. V., 2009. The main principles of application of theory of systems in the research of the complex economic systems of marketing type. Economic Bulletin of NTUU «KPI», 6, p. 317–324.