Agrarian Economy 2022 Т. 15 № 1-2: 93-105

Fodder production and fodder supply in the conditions of modern challenges – current trends and experience of Poland

Cherevko I., Doctor of Economic Sciences, acting Professor
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8411-6136
Lviv National Environmental University

https://doi.org/10.31734/agrarecon2022.01-02.093

ANNOTATION

The purpose of this article is to present the main results of the study of elements of the practice of solving problems and forming the main trends in development and functioning of fodder production in foreign countries, especially in Poland facing current challenges, which may have practical implications for orientation in the development of fodder production and fodder supply of livestock breeders in Ukraine. The urgency of finding the ways to solve the problems of fodder production, fodder base formation and providing animals with the fodder of the appropriate quality and in the needed amount has immeasurably increased in the recent years due to the new modern challenges - the coronavirus pandemic and Russian military intervention in Ukraine, which have caused a number of disproportions and formed a large set of structural imbalances in fodder production and in providing them to animals producers. The situation is aggravated due to these factors action along with the long-standing trend of deteriorating climatic conditions, which is objectively related to the environmental impact on livestock and, consequently, feed production, i.e. environmental friendliness and safety of feed naturally affects the structure of animal husbandry and, accordingly, the environmental friendliness and safety of both this industry and its products in a very wide range of aspects. During the period of formation and effect of the identified challenges, certain trends in the development of fodder production have been formed in the world and foreign animals producers and feed producers have gained some experience in solving those problems. It will not solve the feed problems in Ukraine caused by the Russian military aggression, but can have a certain significance in the formation of approaches to their solution. Based on the main trends in development of fodder production in the world, the main ways of further development of the branch in Ukraine may be related with increasing their level of ecological safety, the development of the use of active feed additives, including of therapeutic nature, optimizing the structure of fodder and animal feeding, improving the quality of feed and the possibility of changing the structure of their production, intensifying fodder production by households, improving feed efficiency, innovation and digitalization of the industry, which will be possible in Ukraine after the victory, the end of hostilities and ensuring the possibility of safe economic activity in the occupied territories.

KEY WORDS

fodder production, pandemic, Russian military aggression, Ukraine, environmental degradation

FULL TEXT

LINK

  1. Brzóska, F. and Podkówka, W., 2016. Definition and systematics of fodder. Animal nutrition and feed science, 3, PWN, Warsaw, 216.
  2. Chmal, M., 2021. The most important trends in the feed market [online] Available at: https://agroprofil.pl/wiadomosci/najwazMore-trendy-na-rynku-pasz/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  3. Coyne, R., Samuelsen, O., Kongshaug, H. et al., 2014. A comparison of oxolinic acid concentrations in farmed and laboratory held rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) following oral therapy. Aquaculture, 239, pp. 1–13.
  4. Drożdż, J., Mroczek, R., Tereszczuk, M. and Urban, R., 2014. Polish food industry in 2008-2013. Warsaw: IERIGŻ-PIB Publishing House, 215.
  5. Dzwonkowski, W. and Hryszko, K., 2011. Report on the situation on the global protein feed market with particular emphasis on GMO plants. Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, 22, Warsaw, 235.
  6. Feed innovations ensure more efficient and environmentally friendly meat production, 2015 [online] Available at: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/118202-feed-innovations-offer-more-efficient-ecological-meat-production/pl [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  7. Greenpeace Poland, 2019. Agriculture committee MEPs defend industrial farms. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/poland/aktualnosci/1692/eurodeputowani-z-commission-rolnictwa-bronia-ferm-Przemysłowych/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  8. Greenpeace Poland, 2019. Less public money for harmful industrial farms. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/poland/aktualnosci/1342/mniej-publicznych-pieniedzy-dla-szkodliwych-ferm-przemyslowych/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  9. Greenpeace Poland, 2019. Meat out of control - Greenpeace report [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/poland/raporty/1728/mieso-poza-kontrola-raport-greenpeace/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  10. Hogart, 2021. Feed production requires solid IT support. [online] Available at: https://businessintelligence.pl/produkcja-pasz-wymaga-solidnego-wsparcia-informatycznego/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  11. Ibatullin, M. I., 2017. Feed, as the basis of effective pig farming in Ukraine. Economy and State, 10, pp. 13–16.
  12. Jeroch, H. and Lipiec, A., 2016. Feed and feed additives. Universal Agricultural and Forest Publishing House, Warsaw.
  13. Kalinchik, M. V., Alekseenko, I. M. and Lysenko, K. O., 2017. Optimization of cow feeding rations as a major factor in the competitiveness of the dairy industry [online] Available at: http://www.winmixsoft.com/files/info/Cow_Ration_Optimization.pdf [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  14. Kowalski, P. and Mrówczyński, K., 2021. A year of pandemic in the food industry. PKO Bank: Report, 55.
  15. Kravchuk, O. O. and Korniichuk, H. V., 2016. Formation of marketing information system in the field of feed production. Legumes and soybeans for the sustainable development of agricultural production in Ukraine: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. August 11–12. Vinnytsia: Dilo, 176, pp. 173–175.
  16. Kropyvko, M. M., 2015. Development of fodder production in households. Economics of AIC, 11, pp. 35–44.
  17. Kwiatek, K., Chomiuk, A. and Przeniosło-Siwczyńska, M., 2016. Medicinal feeds - selected legal aspects of production, placing on the market and use. Veterinary Life, 83, pp. 230–232.
  18. Molenda, A., 2021. Problem with the availability of organic and protein feed. [online] Available at: https://agronews.com.pl/artykul/problem-z-dostepnoscia-pasz-ekologicznych-i-bialkowych/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  19. Most of our fields are for forage production - Greenpeace's Fattening Problem. [online] Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/poland/raporty/1728/mieso-poza-kontrola-raport-greenpeace/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  20. Patyra, E., Kowalczyk, E. and Kwiatek, K., 2012. Selected aspects of the production of medicated feed in Poland and the European Union. Veterinary Life, 87 (10), pp. 863–866.
  21. Pilarska, A., Dach, J., Pilarski, K. and Boniecki, P. 2013. Production and use of feed in Poland: the current state and trends. Agricultural, gardening and forestry technology, 6, pp. 24–27.
  22. Piwowarek, P., 2021. Feeds in a pandemic. Report of Bank Pekao SA and Portalspozywczy.pl. [online] Available at: https://www.portalspozywczy.pl/zboza/wiadomosci/pasze-w-pandemii-raport-banku-pekao-sa-i-portalspozywczy-pl,200182.html [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  23. Posyniak, A., 2019. Veterinary drugs in feed as a source of residues in food and environmental contamination. In: Veterinary pharmacy - management, monitoring, pharmacotherapy, methods of testing veterinary medicinal products and feed. Monograph edited by doc. dr. hab. Wojciech Cybulski, Puławy.
  24. Powell, J. M., Aarons, S. R. and Gourley, C. J.P., 2012. Determinations of feedmilkmanure relationships on grazing-based dairy farms. Animal, 6, pp. 1702–1710.
  25. Powell, J. M., MacLeod, M., Vellinga, T. V. et al., 2013. Feedmilkmanure nitrogen rela-tionships in global dairy production systems. Livestock Science, 152, pp. 261–272.
  26. Problems of feed producers, 2022 [online] Available at: https://www.topagrar.pl/archiwum/2022/top-agrar-052022/problemy-producentow-pasz/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  27. Proper balancing of the nutritional composition of the feed gives greater efficiency of milk production, 2016 [online] Available at: https://portalwysokichplonow.pl/wlasciwe-zbilansowanie-skladu-pokarmowego-paszy-daje-wieksza-efektywnosc-produkcji-mleka// [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  28. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 August 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition, 2003. Journal of Laws UE L 268 of October 18.
  29. Śmigielski, T., 2022. Feed price up! Will there be a shortage of them for Polish breeders? [online] Available at: https://www.agrofakt.pl/cena-pasz-w-gore-czy-zabraknie-ich-dla-polskich-hodowcow/] [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  30. Voronetska, I., Sprynchuk, N. and Kravchuk, O., 2018. Prospects for the development of commodity feed production in Ukraine. Agrosvit, 3, pp. 12–18.
  31. Wojtaszczyk, B., 2022. Unrest on the market: will there be a shortage of poultry feed? [online] Available at: https://www.farmer.pl/produkcja-zwierzeca/drob-i-jaja/niepokoj-na-rynku-czy-zabraknie-pasz-dla-drobiu,117559.html/ [Accessed 15 May 2022].
  32. Yatsiv, I. B. and Temnenko, S. M., 2020. Formation of fodder base as a factor in the development of animal husbandry in agricultural enterprises. Agrosvit, 16, pp. 24–31.